Calcium supports colon health. In a randomized clinical study, calcium reduced the incidence of polyps (small lumps in the body) in the colon, and this effect was observed up to 5 years after the withdrawal of calcium supplements.It has been reported that calcium intake of 700~800mg reduced the incidence of colorectal cancer by 40~50%. However, a randomized clinical study of more than 36,000 postmenopausal women in the United States did not show any protection against colorectal cancer. A Cochrane Review in 2008 acknowledged the potential of calcium supplementation to reduce the incidence of polyps, but found it was not effective enough to prevent colorectal cancer. If you have a lot of colon polyps, if not colon cancer, you may want to take calcium supplements.
One of the most challenging aspects of calcium function is its effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular diseases such as heart disease and stroke. Originally, calcium interferes with the absorption of fat in the intestines and lowers cholesterol, which is said to be good for preventing heart disease. A study of postmenopausal women in Iowa, USA, found that calcium supplementation reduced the incidence of coronary artery disease.
However, many subsequent studies have shown the opposite of calcium's protective effect on heart disease. In a study of postmenopausal women in Sweden, excessive calcium intake of more than 1,400 mg per day was associated with a higher incidence of heart disease and stroke than those who took 600~1,000 mg. Men who ate 1,000 mg of calcium per day had a 20% higher risk of stroke mortality than those who did not eat. Large clinical studies in the United States and Europe in 2011 and 2012, respectively, also showed that calcium supplementation actually increased the incidence of heart disease.
Many were confused. This is because it was a slap in the face to people who had been taking calcium pills because they were said to help with heart disease as well as bones. However, in 2013, researchers at WHI in the United States re-analyzed the existing data by following more than 93,000 menopausal women over an eight-year period and found that there was no evidence that calcium increased the risk of heart disease and stroke. WHI is a large-scale, randomized clinical trial that began in 1993 and has involved more than 160,000 women in the United States. To sum up, it was initially said that calcium is good for heart disease, but then it changed to say that it is not good for heart disease, and now the conclusion is that it is neither good nor bad.
The controversy surrounding calcium's ability to prevent heart disease illustrates why we shouldn't be complacent about the efficacy of supplements. Once again, supplements such as calcium are foods, not drugs. Unlike medications, foods are more likely to produce jagged results. Regarding the efficacy of nutritional supplements in treating diseases, it is necessary to wait for consistent results from multiple papers over a long period of time. The conclusion so far is that calcium is necessary for the prevention of bone diseases such as osteoporosis, but it is not necessary to take it to prevent heart disease, and excessive calcium intake should be avoided.
What if you have stones in your kidneys?This is something that many people who take calcium supplements have a question about. Theoretically, calcium is likely to cause stones. The most common form of kidney stones is calcium oxalate. In fact, postmenopausal women who took 1,000 mg of calcium supplement daily with 400 IU of vitamin D were observed for 7 years and found a 17% increase in kidney stones compared to placebo.
Comments (0)
There are no comments for this article. Be the first one to leave a message!